By Chuks Peter, DELTA
The recent ban on scrap metal scavengers by the Delta State government has sparked varied reactions from both residents and non-residents.
Our correspondent’s investigations reveal a divided opinion on this new policy.
While some individuals have expressed support for the government’s decision, citing the need for better regulation and environmental management, others are concerned about the potential increase in unemployment resulting from the ban.
They argue that scavenging encompasses various categories and should not be universally prohibited.
Critics of the ban suggest that a regulatory body should be established to oversee scavenging activities rather than implementing an outright ban.
They proposed that the Ministry of Environment and other relevant agencies could devise a structured approach to mitigate any negative impacts and manage the sector more effectively.
Respondents noted that the ban has adversely affected companies involved in recycling and related industries, leading to business shutdowns and job losses for many youths.
They urged the state government to reconsider the decision and explore alternative solutions that balance regulation with economic opportunity, warning that the current policy might inadvertently lead to increased crime rates.
Some respondents proposed that instead of a complete ban, the state should enact laws with penalties for violations of scrap metal scavenging regulations.
These penalties could range from fines to imprisonment, offering a more controlled and legal framework for managing scavenging activities.
The public discourse surrounding the ban reflects a need for the Delta State government to reassess its approach and consider more nuanced and regulatory solutions that address both environmental concerns and economic realities.
